Synergist - February 2010

to a finite checklist of applicable OSHA regulations.

In regard to air monitoring, IHs usually compare results to occupational exposure limits (OELs) or other air quality standards. But just because the results of representative air monitoring of an area or person are within OELs or other standards does not mean that IHs should describe an area as “safe.” For example, when the visual-cleanliness inspection and air sampling of an area after asbestos removal meets the EPA guidance criteria in a commercial building, the asbestos contractor is typically released and the area may be reoccupied by unprotected personnel. But the area may not be safe for further activities, such as demolition or renovation, if additional hazards remain. Therefore, the area would not be necessarily safe.

The Psychology of Words
IHs who overuse finite words of evalua-
tion may appear to be authoritarian and
unreceptive to criticism. For example:
“The test result of the batch mixer’s
exposure is twelve times the OEL for the
powder. It is critical that the mixer wears
a full-face respirator. This is the required
respirator approved by the IH Depart-
ment, and it is necessary for the batch
mixing process. It is not satisfactory for
the mixer to use a half-face respirator as
he does now.”
These statements communicate that a
finite evaluation has already been made.
The IH does not appear open to enter-
taining administrative and engineering
controls for the mixing process, suggest-
ing a review for potential anomalies dur-
ing the exposure test, considering more
testing, or inviting input by the mixing
department.

nance supervisor, and it is good news. He is confident about working on energized wiring while the conveyor belt continues to run. I believe he can do the job with low risk. Along those lines, it is recommended that our company formally evaluate the safety issues with electrical procedures around the plant in the near future to comply with OSHA.”

Watch Your Language Laws and regulations typically contain strong words of conviction, performance, extreme measurement, and finite evaluation. When IHs prepare their own documentation, these words can be used when appropriate—but they should be used carefully.

David N. Kudlinski, CIH, CSP, is a consultant with BureauVeritas.Hecanbereachedat(714)431- 4125ordavid.kudlinski@us.bureauveritas.com.

Check out the newest publication to hit the shelves of AIHA

The Radiation Safety Officer Survival Handbook

By Joseph Vincelli, Norman W. Henry III, John Miller, James R. Weldy

Stock# ERDH09-760 Member Price: $55 Nonmember Price: $69

The use of radiation in research, medicine, and industry is highly regulated. Safety profes-
sionals working with radiation must possess not only a good understanding of science but
also of regulatory requirements. The RSO Handbook provides an introduction to radiation
safety, including basic radiation science, radiation safety practices and procedures, and
federal or state regulations. References and examples of forms to be used for surveys, audits,
or other specific investigations. The information provided in this reference will benefit the
RSO working in an academic, research or medical facility.